You are currently browsing the monthly archive for March, 2007.
2. Lacking or deficient in emotion or feeling; indifferent: She was numb to their pleas for mercy.
I re-read all of my blog postings and it was amazing looking back on this month and realising how much I still agree with myself. Which probably isn’t a good thing, cos it means I havn’t actually found awnsers to any of the questions i’ve been asking. Though it has re-affirmed and strengthened my resolve for how detirmined I am to figure out the awnsers.
Theres just been so much going on, that I’m really not suprised about how overwhlemed I am about everything. It is surprising though how lazy my mind is because it’s been really hard talking to people about all of this stuff because all I want to do is tell them to go read my blog, it’s all written down there. Though there is alot more clarity to my thoughts on here than when they’re all swimming around in my head. It was also amazing to see how much of the stuff I had forgotten, but had reiterated through out my postings. Like the song lyrics in Lyrics and Life that say “You pretend to create and observe, When you really detach from feeling alive.” Which is true to the point were I use my postings on here to elaborate what I think, but once they’re written I don’t have to deal with them because it’s been made into a hard copy and not just my thoughts so I don’t have to think about it. I do that with my art too, using it to express what i’m thinking or feeling and also with talking to people about my issues, I give them the opertunity to help me but I never really take responcibility into dealing with them. Theres always an outlet, theres always a way for me to make myself feel numb.
So whilst i’m talking about blogs and elaboration I thought I might put out my ideas on perennial philosophy, which I mentioned about in my first post.
“The notion of perennial philosophy suggests the existence of a universal set of truths and values common to all peoples and cultures.
According to the tenets of the perennial philosophy, people in many cultures and eras have experienced and recorded comparable perceptions about the nature of reality, the self, the world, and the meaning and purpose of existence. These similarities point to underlying universal principles, forming the common ground of most religions. Differences among these fundamental perceptions arise from differences in human cultures and can be explained in light of such cultural conditioning.”
I love that explanation because it outlines the idea of history experiencing the nature of reality, the self, the world and the purpose of exsistance. How easy is it to get confused about these things becuase of the limited amount of information, the limited amount of relevance to the way you perceive the world or the fact that society has conditioned everyone to become selfserving. “Society has little to do with serving the individual, so any happiness you have you’ve created for yourself, which leads to having to rely on being self sufficent to survive.” This pretty much shows that societys direction is to make you the most comfortable, not nessecarily the most happy. It’s not about whats good for you, it’s about how comfortable they can make you so your easier to manipulate and won’t complain about it. This way people stop quesioning things.
History shows that even though peoples perception about the nature of things is intierly subjective to the way the indervidual perceived them, they still are the same in there (universal) truths, and thus comparable. The only reason why we perceive them as being different is because of cultural conditioning, in western society it’s about serving the individual and the individual making a whole. Eastern society is the opposite, there is the whole and the individual serves the whole. Also I think that relidgion is formed from how the individual is formed, enviromental and external influences creates certain personalities that mesh better with cerain relidgions, though that only goes as far as the person is willing to take control of there own life.
“Among these perceptions are the following assertions:
+ The physical or phenomenal world is not the only reality; another non-physical reality exists. The material world is the shadow of a higher reality which cannot be grasped by the senses, but the human spirit and intellect bear testimony to it in their essence.”
All I really need to say is that every one comes to an understanding of this by there own experiences. I descovered it by realising the concept of infinity was more complicated than I could ever imagine, but it exsists inside our own bodies. Read the last paragraph of Models, Moaning and Waiting for more.
+ Humans mirror the nature of this two-sided reality: while the material body is subject to the physical laws of birth and death, the other aspect of human existence is not subject to decay or loss, and is identical to the intellect or spirit, which is the sine qua non of the human soul. In the modern West, this second or other reality has been frequently discounted or ignored.
This one is a doosey. I had to look up “sine qua non” in the dictionary to reall understand what it all ment. Sine qua non: an indispensable condition, element, or factor; something essential. I think the reality of a soul today is somewhat steriotypicalised, mostly because the roles of being human, and being a man or a woman are so stylised that figuring out the basics of what it means to be a man or a woman, or even a human in general, is lost. I’m just beginging to take the initiative on figuring out what it means to be a woman. Not a woman in todays society, but what it is to really reflect what god made women to be. I’ll be sure to post on my findings later.
+ All humans possess a capacity, however unused and thus atrophied, for intuitive perceptions of ultimate or absolute truth, and the nature of reality. This perception is the final goal of human beings, and its pursuit and flourishing are the purpose of their existence. The major religions try to (re)establish the link between the human soul and this higher and ultimate reality.
Ahh the ultimate goal, whats at the end of the univerce. This kind of amuses me because they way it’s worded suggests that there is a beginning, a middle and an end to life. It’s true physically, but you must remember that the mind and thus the spirit (or what I like to call the heart) is a relativley infinite thing. It’s more about the fact that we do have the capacity to make reasoned judgements about what is the absolute truth and the nature of reality that gives us our purpose. Then faith is played into it because infinity is put into place and our concept of reality cannot justify infinity, so faith is needed to establish infinity into a finite thing.
These worldwide perceptions are thought to be amendable with one another and reliable in themselves because of their internal consistency and due to the similarities among them, in spite of their often independent origins.
Well in other words, through out history people have talked about all of these points in there own understandings, and what was consistant about all of these perceptions was the basis for perernnial philosophy. Just like my understanding of life correlates with all of these points. Does yours?






